Why We Don't Focus on Zionism or Israel
This project does not seek to define Zionism or to describe the State of Israel. That is an intentional decision. There exists no shortage of institutions, texts, and cultural machinery—Jewish and otherwise—dedicated to those tasks. The historical, ideological, and emotional terrain around both terms is vast, fragmented, and often polemical. We take no interest in adjudicating between these meanings, nor in adding to their discursive weight. Readers are fully entitled to bring their own working definitions, whether nationalist, post-nationalist, religious, secular, critical, or otherwise. That conversation is important elsewhere. It is not the conversation here.
Our concern is with antizionism as a global formation—its logics, consequences, and operations across contexts. To center Zionism or Israel in this analysis is to recenter Jewish identity performance, to return again to the self-explanation loop that Jewish discourse so often falls into: a kind of reflexive moral accounting that functions more to soothe the Jewish speaker than to confront structural hostility. This project resists that turn. We are not here to justify, reframe, or rehabilitate Zionism. We are here to name antizionism as a socially legitimized mode of exclusion, one that no longer requires coherence or consistency to operate. Any analysis that begins with “what Zionism really means” is already off track. We begin elsewhere.
Relatedly, we advocate for dropping the hyphen in antizionism.